Do Weekend Discharges Impact Readmission Rate in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Weekend readmissions have been previously associated with increased mortality after pancreatic resection, but the effect of weekend discharge is less understood. In this study, we aim to determine the impact of weekend discharges on 30-day readmission rate after pancreatic surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at a single, high-volume institution between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively reviewed from a targeted, institutional ACS-NSQIP database. Patients who died prior to discharge were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between readmission and weekend discharge. RESULTS: Out of 2042 patients who underwent pancreatectomy, 418 patients (20.5%) were discharged on the weekend. Weekend discharge was associated with fewer Whipple surgeries, fewer open surgical approaches, and shorter operative time. Patients discharged on the weekend were also less likely to have had postoperative complications such as delayed gastric emptying (DGE) (6.7% vs 12.6%, p < 0.01) and were more frequently discharged to home (91.1% vs. 85.3%, p < 0.01). Thirty-day readmission rate was almost identical between groups (14.8% vs 14.8%, p = 0.997). On multivariable analysis, 30-day readmission was independently associated with DGE (OR (95% CI): 3.48 (2.31-5.23), p < 0.01), postoperative pancreatic fistula (3.36 (2.34-4.83), p < 0.01), myocardial infarction, and perioperative blood transfusion, but not weekend discharge (1.02 (0.72-1.43), p = 0.93). Readmission rate also did not differ significantly when including Friday discharges in the weekend group (15.2% vs 14.6%, p = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: With careful clinical decision making, patients may safely be discharged on the weekend after pancreatic surgery without increasing 30-day readmission rate.

EUS-guided fine needle aspiration-based clues to mistaken or uncertain identity: serous pancreatic cysts.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic serous cystic neoplasms (SCN) present a diagnostic challenge given their increasing frequency of detection and benign nature yet relatively high rate of misdiagnosis. Here, imaging and analyses associated with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) are evaluated for their ability to provide a correct preoperative diagnosis of SCN. METHODS: A surgical cohort with confirmed pathological diagnosis of SCN (n = 62) and a surveillance cohort with likely SCN (n = 31) were assessed for imaging (CT/MRI/EUS) and EUS-FNA-based analyses (cytology/DNA analysis for Von Hippel-Lindau [VHL] gene alterations/biomarkers). RESULTS: In the surgical cohort, CT/MRI and EUS respectively predicted SCN in 4 of 58(7%) and 19 of 62(31%). Cyst fluid cytology and VHL alterations predicted SCN in 1 of 51(2%) and 5 of 21(24%), respectively. High specificity cyst fluid biomarkers (vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF]/glucose/carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]/amylase) correctly identified SCN in 25 of 27(93%). In the surveillance cohort, cyst fluid biomarkers predicted SCN in 12 of 12(100%) while VHL alterations identified SCN 3 of 10(30%). CONCLUSION: High specificity cyst fluid biomarkers provided the most sensitive means of diagnosing SCN preoperatively. To obtain a preoperative diagnosis of SCN at the highest level of certainty, a multidisciplinary approach should be taken to inform appropriate SCN management.

Magnetic resonance imaging-derived fat fraction predicts risk of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm.

PURPOSE: Assess the relationship between MRI-derived pancreatic fat fraction and risk of malignancy in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). METHODS: MRIs of patients with IPMN who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy were analyzed. IPMN with low-grade dysplasia (n = 29) were categorized as low-risk while IPMN at high risk of malignancy consisted of those with high-grade dysplasia/invasive carcinoma (n = 33). Pancreatic fat-fraction (FFmean) was measured using the 2-point Dixon-method. Images were evaluated for the high-risk stigmata and worrisome features according to the revised 2017 Fukuoka consensus criteria. Data on serum CA19-9, Diabetes Mellitus (DM) status, body mass index (BMI), and histological chronic pancreatitis were obtained. RESULTS: A significant difference in FFmean was found between the high-risk IPMN (11.45%) and low-risk IPMN (9.95%) groups (p = 0.027). Serum CA19-9 level (p = 0.021), presence of cyst wall enhancement (p = 0.029), and solid mass (p = 0.008) were significantly associated with high-risk IPMN. There was a significant correlation between FFmean and mural nodule size (r = 0.36, p Ë‚ 0.01), type 2 DM (r = 0.34, p Ë‚ 0.01), age (r = 0.31, p Ë‚ 0.05), serum CA 19-9 (r = 0.30, p Ë‚ 0.05), cyst diameter (r = 0.30, p Ë‚ 0.05), and main pancreatic duct diameter (r = 0.26, p Ë‚ 0.05). Regression analysis revealed FFmean (OR 1.103, p = 0.035) as an independent predictive variable of high-risk IPMN. CONCLUSION: FFmean is significantly associated with high-risk IPMN and an independent predictor of IPMN malignant risk. FFmean may have clinical utility as a biomarker to complement the current IPMN treatment algorithm and improve clinical decision making regarding the need for surgical resection or surveillance.